1. Anuvijjakaanuyoga1. Investigation

Anuvijjakena codako pucchitabbo—The investigator should ask the accuser: “yaṁ kho tvaṁ, āvuso, imaṁ bhikkhuṁ codesi, kimhi naṁ codesi, sīlavipattiyā vā codesi, ācāravipattiyā vā codesi, diṭṭhivipattiyā vā codesī”ti?“Do you accuse this monk of failure in morality, conduct, or view?”

So ce evaṁ vadeyya—If he says, “sīlavipattiyā vā codemi, ācāravipattiyā vā codemi, diṭṭhivipattiyā vā codemī”ti, so evamassa vacanīyo—“I am accusing him of failure in morality,” “I am accusing him of failure in conduct,” or “I am accusing him of failure in view,” he should be asked, “jānāsi panāyasmā sīlavipattiṁ, jānāsi ācāravipattiṁ, jānāsi diṭṭhivipattin”ti?“Do you know what failure in morality is?” “Do you know what failure in conduct is?” or “Do you know what failure in view is?”

So ce evaṁ vadeyya—If he says, “jānāmi kho ahaṁ, āvuso, sīlavipattiṁ, jānāmi ācāravipattiṁ, jānāmi diṭṭhivipattin”ti, so evamassa vacanīyo—“I do,” he should be asked what they are.

“katamā panāvuso, sīlavipatti? Katamā ācāravipatti? Katamā diṭṭhivipattī”ti? So ce evaṁ vadeyya—If he says, “cattāri ca pārājikāni, terasa ca saṅghādisesā, ayaṁ sīlavipatti.“The four offenses entailing expulsion and the thirteen entailing suspension are failure in morality,” Thullaccayaṁ, pācittiyaṁ, pāṭidesanīyaṁ, dukkaṭaṁ, dubbhāsitaṁ, ayaṁ ācāravipatti.“The serious offenses, the offenses entailing confession, the offenses entailing acknowledgment, the offenses of wrong conduct, and the offenses of wrong speech are failure in conduct,” Micchādiṭṭhi, antaggāhikā diṭṭhi, ayaṁ diṭṭhivipattī”ti, so evamassa vacanīyo—“Wrong views and extreme views are failure in view,” he should be asked, “yaṁ kho tvaṁ, āvuso, imaṁ bhikkhuṁ codesi, diṭṭhena vā codesi sutena vā codesi parisaṅkāya vā codesī”ti?“Are you accusing this monk because of what you’ve seen, what you’ve heard, or what you suspect?”

So ce evaṁ vadeyya—If he says, “diṭṭhena vā codemi sutena vā codemi parisaṅkāya vā codemī”ti, so evamassa vacanīyo—“I’m accusing him because of what I’ve seen,” “I’m accusing him because of what I’ve heard,” or “I’m accusing him because of what I suspect,” he should be asked, “yaṁ kho tvaṁ, āvuso, imaṁ bhikkhuṁ diṭṭhena codesi, kiṁ te diṭṭhaṁ kinti te diṭṭhaṁ, kadā te diṭṭhaṁ, kattha te diṭṭhaṁ pārājikaṁ ajjhāpajjanto diṭṭho, saṅghādisesaṁ ajjhāpajjanto diṭṭho, thullaccayaṁ …“Since you’re accusing this monk because of what you’ve seen, what have you seen? How did you see it? When did you see it? Where did you see it? Did you see him commit an offense entailing expulsion? Did you see him commit an offense entailing suspension? Did you see him commit a serious offense? pācittiyaṁ …… an offense entailing confession? pāṭidesanīyaṁ …… an offense entailing acknowledgment? dukkaṭaṁ …… an offense of wrong conduct? dubbhāsitaṁ ajjhāpajjanto diṭṭho, kattha ca tvaṁ ahosi, kattha cāyaṁ bhikkhu ahosi, kiñca tvaṁ karosi, kiṁ cāyaṁ bhikkhu karotī”ti?… an offense of wrong speech? Where were you? Where was this monk? What were you doing? What was this monk doing?”

So ce evaṁ vadeyya—If he says, “na kho ahaṁ, āvuso, imaṁ bhikkhuṁ diṭṭhena codemi, api ca sutena codemī”ti, so evamassa vacanīyo—“I didn’t accuse this monk because of what I’ve seen, but because of what I’ve heard,” he should be asked, “yaṁ kho tvaṁ, āvuso, imaṁ bhikkhuṁ sutena codesi, kiṁ te sutaṁ, kinti te sutaṁ, kadā te sutaṁ, kattha te sutaṁ, pārājikaṁ ajjhāpannoti sutaṁ, saṅghādisesaṁ …“Since you’re accusing this monk because of what you’ve heard, what have you heard? How did you hear it? When did you hear it? Where did you hear it? Did you hear that he has committed an offense entailing expulsion? Did you hear that he has committed an offense entailing suspension? thullaccayaṁ …… a serious offense? pācittiyaṁ …… an offense entailing confession? pāṭidesanīyaṁ …… an offense entailing acknowledgment? dukkaṭaṁ …… an offense of wrong conduct? dubbhāsitaṁ ajjhāpannoti sutaṁ, bhikkhussa sutaṁ, bhikkhuniyā sutaṁ, sikkhamānāya sutaṁ, sāmaṇerassa sutaṁ, sāmaṇeriyā sutaṁ, upāsakassa sutaṁ, upāsikāya sutaṁ, rājūnaṁ sutaṁ, rājamahāmattānaṁ sutaṁ, titthiyānaṁ sutaṁ, titthiyasāvakānaṁ sutan”ti?Did you hear that he has committed an offense of wrong speech? Did you hear it from a monk, a nun, a trainee nun, a novice monk, a novice nun, a male lay follower, or a female lay follower? Or did you hear it from kings, a king’s officials, the monastics of another religion, or the lay followers of another religion?”

So ce evaṁ vadeyya—If he says, “na kho ahaṁ, āvuso, imaṁ bhikkhuṁ sutena codemi, api ca parisaṅkāya codemī”ti, so evamassa vacanīyo—“I didn’t accuse this monk because of what I’ve heard, but because of what I suspect,” he should be asked, “yaṁ kho tvaṁ, āvuso, imaṁ bhikkhuṁ parisaṅkāya codesi, kiṁ parisaṅkasi, kinti parisaṅkasi, kadā parisaṅkasi, kattha parisaṅkasi, pārājikaṁ ajjhāpannoti parisaṅkasi, saṅghādisesaṁ ajjhāpannoti parisaṅkasi, thullaccayaṁ …“Since you’re accusing this monk because of suspicion, what do you suspect? How do you suspect it? When did you suspect it? Where did you suspect it? Do you suspect that he has committed an offense entailing expulsion? Do you suspect that he has committed an offense entailing suspension? Do you suspect that he has committed a serious offense? pācittiyaṁ …… an offense entailing confession? pāṭidesanīyaṁ …… an offense entailing acknowledgment? dukkaṭaṁ …… an offense of wrong conduct? dubbhāsitaṁ ajjhāpannoti parisaṅkasi, bhikkhussa sutvā parisaṅkasi, bhikkhuniyā sutvā parisaṅkasi, sikkhamānāya sutvā parisaṅkasi, sāmaṇerassa sutvā parisaṅkasi, sāmaṇeriyā sutvā parisaṅkasi, upāsakassa sutvā parisaṅkasi, upāsikāya sutvā parisaṅkasi, rājūnaṁ sutvā parisaṅkasi, rājamahāmattānaṁ sutvā parisaṅkasi, titthiyānaṁ sutvā parisaṅkasi, titthiyasāvakānaṁ sutvā parisaṅkasī”ti?Do you suspect that he has committed an offense of wrong speech? Do you suspect it after hearing about it from a monk, a nun, a trainee nun, a novice monk, a novice nun, a male lay follower, or a female lay follower? Or do you suspect it after hearing about it from kings, a king’s officials, the monastics of another religion, or the lay followers of another religion?”

Diṭṭhaṁ diṭṭhena sameti, diṭṭhena saṁsandate diṭṭhaṁ;If what he saw agrees with what he says he saw, if they correspond with each other, Diṭṭhaṁ paṭicca na upeti, asuddhaparisaṅkito;But what was seen is not adequate to prove the accusation, then the one suspecting impurity So puggalo paṭiññāya, kātabbo tenuposatho.Should admit it, and they should then do the observance-day ceremony with him.

Sutaṁ sutena sameti, sutena saṁsandate sutaṁ;If what he heard agrees with what he says he heard, if they correspond with each other, Sutaṁ paṭicca na upeti, asuddhaparisaṅkito;But what was heard is not adequate to prove the accusation, then the one suspecting impurity So puggalo paṭiññāya, kātabbo tenuposatho.Should admit it, and they should then do the observance-day ceremony with him.

Mutaṁ mutena sameti, mutena saṁsandate mutaṁ;If what he sensed agrees with what he says he sensed, if they correspond with each other, Mutaṁ paṭicca na upeti, asuddhaparisaṅkito;But what was sensed is not adequate to prove the accusation, then the one suspecting impurity So puggalo paṭiññāya, kātabbo tenuposatho.Should admit it, and they should then do the observance-day ceremony with him.

Codanāya ko ādi, kiṁ majjhe, kiṁ pariyosānaṁ?What is the beginning, the middle, and the end of an accusation? Codanāya okāsakammaṁ ādi, kiriyā majjhe, samatho pariyosānaṁ.Getting permission for the accusation is the beginning, doing it is the middle, settling it is the end.

Codanāya kati mūlāni, kati vatthūni, kati bhūmiyo, katihākārehi codeti?How many roots does accusing have, how many bases, and how many grounds? And in how many ways does one accuse? Codanāya dve mūlāni, tīṇi vatthūni, pañca bhūmiyo, dvīhākārehi codeti.It has two roots, three bases, and five grounds. And one accuses in two ways.

Codanāya katamāni dve mūlāni?What are the two roots? Samūlikā vā amūlikā vā—With a root and without a root. codanāya imāni dve mūlāni. Codanāya katamāni tīṇi vatthūni?What are the three bases? Diṭṭhena sutena parisaṅkāya—The seen, the heard, and the suspected. codanāya imāni tīṇi vatthūni. Codanāya katamā pañca bhūmiyo?What are the five grounds? Kālena vakkhāmi no akālena, bhūtena vakkhāmi no abhūtena, saṇhena vakkhāmi no pharusena, atthasaṁhitena vakkhāmi no anatthasaṁhitena, mettācitto vakkhāmi no dosantaroti—“I’ll speak at an appropriate time, not at an inappropriate one; I’ll speak the truth, not falsehood; I’ll speak gently, not harshly; I’ll speak what’s beneficial, not what’s unbeneficial; I’ll speak with a mind of good will, not with ill will.” codanāya imā pañca bhūmiyo. Katamehi dvīhākārehi codeti?What are the two ways of accusing? Kāyena vā codeti vācāya vā codeti—One accuses by body or by speech. imehi dvīhākārehi codeti.

2. Codakādipaṭipatti2. The proceeding of an accuser, etc.

Codakena kathaṁ paṭipajjitabbaṁ?How should the accuser proceed? Cuditakena kathaṁ paṭipajjitabbaṁ?How should the accused proceed? Saṅghena kathaṁ paṭipajjitabbaṁ?How should the Sangha proceed? Anuvijjakena kathaṁ paṭipajjitabbaṁ?How should the investigator proceed?

Codakena kathaṁ paṭipajjitabbanti?“How should the accuser proceed?” Codakena pañcasu dhammesu patiṭṭhāya paro codetabbo.The accuser should set up five qualities before accusing another: Kālena vakkhāmi no akālena, bhūtena vakkhāmi no abhūtena, saṇhena vakkhāmi no pharusena, atthasaṁhitena vakkhāmi no anatthasaṁhitena, mettācitto vakkhāmi no dosantaroti—“I’ll speak at an appropriate time, not at an inappropriate one; I’ll speak the truth, not falsehood; I’ll speak gently, not harshly; I’ll speak what’s beneficial, not what’s unbeneficial; I’ll speak with a mind of good will, not with ill will.”

codakena evaṁ paṭipajjitabbaṁ. Cuditakena kathaṁ paṭipajjitabbanti?“How should the accused proceed?” Cuditakena dvīsu dhammesu paṭipajjitabbaṁ.The accused should set up two qualities: Sacce ca akuppe ca—truth and composure.

cuditakena evaṁ paṭipajjitabbaṁ. Saṅghena kathaṁ paṭipajjitabbanti?“How should the Sangha proceed?” Saṅghena otiṇṇānotiṇṇaṁ jānitabbaṁ.The Sangha should know what has been brought before it and what has not.

Saṅghena evaṁ paṭipajjitabbaṁ. Anuvijjakena kathaṁ paṭipajjitabbanti?“How should the investigator proceed?” Anuvijjakena yena dhammena yena vinayena yena satthusāsanena taṁ adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati tathā taṁ adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasametabbaṁ.The investigator resolves that legal issue in accordance with the Teaching, the Monastic Law, and the Teacher’s instruction. Anuvijjakena evaṁ paṭipajjitabbaṁ.

Uposatho kimatthāya, pavāraṇā kissa kāraṇā;What is the purpose of the observance-day ceremony? why is there an invitation ceremony? Parivāso kimatthāya, mūlāyapaṭikassanā kissa kāraṇā;What is the purpose of probation? why is there a sending back to the beginning? Mānattaṁ kimatthāya, abbhānaṁ kissa kāraṇā.What is the purpose of the trial period? why is there rehabilitation?

Uposatho sāmaggatthāya, visuddhatthāya pavāraṇā;The purpose of the observance-day ceremony is unity. the purpose of the invitation ceremony is purity. Parivāso mānattatthāya, mūlāyapaṭikassanā niggahatthāya;The purpose of probation is the trial period. the purpose of sending back to the beginning is restraint. Mānattaṁ abbhānatthāya, visuddhatthāya abbhānaṁ.The purpose of the trial period is rehabilitation. the purpose of rehabilitation is purity.

Chandā dosā bhayā mohā, there ca paribhāsati;If, because of desire, ill will, fear, or confusion, one reviles senior monks, Kāyassa bhedā duppañño, khato upahatindriyo;Then, when the body breaks up, that foolish person, damaged, with impaired faculties, Nirayaṁ gacchati dummedho, na ca sikkhāya gāravo.Being stupid, goes to hell, without respect for the training.

Na ca āmisaṁ nissāya, na ca nissāya puggalaṁ;But not depending on worldly gain, not depending on individuals, Ubho ete vivajjetvā, yathādhammo tathā kare.Giving up both of these, one should act according to the Teaching.

3. Codakassaattajhāpana3. The accuser burning himself

Kodhano upanāhī ca, caṇḍo ca paribhāsako;“Angry and resentful, and fierce, reviling, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.

Upakaṇṇakaṁ jappati jimhaṁ pekkhati, vītiharati kummaggaṁ paṭisevati;Whispering in the ear, looking for flaws, vindictive, following the wrong path, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.

Akālena codeti abhūtena, pharusena anatthasaṁhitena;Accusing at the wrong time, untruthfully, harshly, without benefit, Dosantaro codeti no mettācitto, anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti;With a mind of ill will, not a mind of good will, he charges a non-offender with an offense— Tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.Such an accuser burns himself.

Dhammādhammaṁ na jānāti, dhammādhammassa akovido;Not knowing the Teaching and what is contrary to it, ignorant about both, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.

Vinayāvinayaṁ na jānāti, vinayāvinayassa akovido;Not knowing the Monastic Law and what is contrary to it, ignorant about both, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.

Bhāsitābhāsitaṁ na jānāti, bhāsitābhāsitassa akovido;Not knowing what was spoken and what was not, ignorant about both, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.

Āciṇṇānāciṇṇaṁ na jānāti, āciṇṇānāciṇṇassa akovido;Not knowing what was practiced and what was not, ignorant about both, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.

Paññattāpaññattaṁ na jānāti, paññattāpaññattassa akovido;Not knowing what was laid down and what was not, ignorant about both, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.

Āpattānāpattiṁ na jānāti, āpattānāpattiyā akovido;Not knowing the offenses and the non-offenses, ignorant about both, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.

Lahukagarukaṁ na jānāti, lahukagarukassa akovido;Not knowing light and heavy offenses, ignorant about both, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.

Sāvasesānavasesaṁ na jānāti, sāvasesānavasesassa akovido;Not knowing curable and incurable offenses, ignorant about both, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.

Duṭṭhullāduṭṭhullaṁ na jānāti, duṭṭhullāduṭṭhullassa akovido;Not knowing grave and minor offenses, ignorant about both, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.

Pubbāparaṁ na jānāti, pubbāparassa akovido;Not knowing the right order, ignorant about it, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānaṁ.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.

Anusandhivacanapathaṁ na jānāti, anusandhivacanapathassa akovido;Not knowing the sequence of statements, ignorant about it, Anāpattiyā āpattīti ropeti, tādiso codako jhāpeti attānanti.He charges a non-offender with an offense— such an accuser burns himself.”

Codanākaṇḍaṁ niṭṭhitaṁ.Accusations and the process of investigation are finished.